Skip Navigation

Recent News

December 2nd Meeting Archive

Former DOT Employee Charged with Violating Ethics Law

Monday, November 17: Civil Penalty Hearings for Violation of the Lobbying Act

Former State Employee Pays $2,460 for Taking Tickets to Ball Games

October 7th Meeting Archive

September 2nd Meeting Archive

August 5th Meeting Archive

In the Matter of an Investigation Into the Alleged Misuse of Resources of the Division of State Police

Commissioners' letter to the NY Times

Emergency Adoption of new Regulations

Subscribe: rss

Lobbying, ethics probe must be kept mum

First published: Wednesday, September 10, 2008

I am writing to correct two errors in Rick Karlin's article "Pulling a shroud over public integrity probe" (Sept. 3).

First, the article repeats a mistake made by several "good government" groups who believed the Commission on Public Integrity was adopting a rule "regarding holding closed sessions on adjudicatory proceedings," which often involve witness testimony before an administrative law judge. In fact, the commission's rule was, and is, to conduct open adjudicatory proceedings, not to close them.

The article goes on to confuse the rule governing adjudicatory proceedings with the law regarding investigations, which may or may not result in allegations of wrongdoing. As a result of the 2007 enactment of the Public Employee Ethics Reform Act, by law (Executive Law Section 94 (12)) both lobbying and ethics investigations must be kept confidential unless and until they result in any formal allegations of wrongdoing.

Walter C. Ayres

The writer is director of communications for the Commission on Public Integrity