Skip Navigation

Recent News

Former State Employee to Pay $8,000 for Ethics Law Violations

Former DEC Employee to Pay $15,000 for Violating Ethics Law

Computer Error Caused Miscalculation of Lobby Data

Company Charged with Giving Illegal Gifts

Commission Posts FDS of Candidates for Statewide Elected Office

Commission Launches New Lobbyist Newsletter

Commission on Public Integrity Releases Annual Report, Notes Drop in Lobbying Spending

Agency Head Fined $3,600 for Failing to File Financial Disclosure Statement In a Timely Manner

President and CEO of Westchester County Health Care Corp. Agrees to Pay $3,000 For Accepting Illegal Gifts from Vendor

April 8th, 2010 Meeting Archive

Commission on Public Integrity Charges Another Lobbying Entity In Connection with Legislative Receptions

Governor Charged With Soliciting Unlawful Gifts, May Have Given False Testimony

Subscribe: rss

January 4, 2008

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 4, 2008
Contact: Walter C. Ayres
518-408-3976

ALBANY - The New York State Commission on Public Integrity today released an advisory opinion regarding the use of State aircraft.

The Commission concluded that:

(1) a State official will not be required to reimburse the State for incidental personal time or the time between government meetings;

(2) reimbursement is not required for time spent on non-State business, such as eating, sleeping or being with family, during multi-day trips provided that the standards in Advisory Opinion No. 07-03 are otherwise met;

(3) reimbursement is required for the staff of public officials who attend political events, unless they are required as part of their official duties to accompany the public official, such as security personnel;

(4) the State official must take steps to ensure that the State is correctly reimbursed for the use of State resources for non-State purposes, and must seek guidance from those authorities that regulate the use of campaign funds if seeking to reimburse from campaign funds;

(5) if the aircraft is used for one-way of a trip, the official is to look to the cost that would be charged by a private charter company for a one-way trip comparable to the State official's trip; and

(6) the unavailability of other modes of transportation is not relevant to the determination of whether reimbursement to the State is necessary when the State official, who is using State aircraft, attends political events during the trip.

A copy of the opinion follows. Opinion 07-05